WHAT IS THE SITUATION
REGARDING VENEZUELA’s DEEPENING CRISIS?
The U.S. military recently apprehended
Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro and his wife in Caracas on January 3rd as part of "Operation Absolute
Resolve." Both were taken into custody and brought before a U.S. court.
They face four charges: conspiracy to commit narco-terrorism, conspiracy to
import cocaine, and conspiracy to possess machine guns and destructive devices.
The report states that the Venezuelan army was actually in
collusion with the United States. Therefore, the Venezuelan army did not fire a
single missile, or even a single bullet, at the American forces. The US won the
war in just three hours. Venezuela surrendered without a fight.
According
to the Associated Press, many lives were lost in the US military operation.
Venezuelan Attorney General Tarek William Saab said that dozens of security
officers and civilians were killed in the operation in Caracas. Cuba confirmed
the deaths of 32 of its military and police officers.
Meanwhile, six of the 200 US soldiers involved were
wounded.
In Venezuela, Nicolás Maduro
has been sworn in for a third term as president. Maduro declared himself
"innocent" before a U.S. court, asserting that he is still the
president of Venezuela. He categorically denied all four charges of
narco-terrorism and drug trafficking.
SWORN IN AS INTERIM PRESIDENT
Currently, Venezuelan Vice President Delcy Rodríguez has been
sworn in as interim president. Following Maduro's arrest, interim President
Delcy Rodríguez lashed out at the United States. She declared seven days of
national mourning in honor of those killed in the alleged US military attack in
Caracas.
She said that they had been attacked. Speaking to the media, she
stated that Venezuela is a peaceful country and is not subject to any external
power. He also demanded the immediate return of Maduro and his wife, Cilia
Flores.
Donald Trump has said that he is effectively
running Venezuela. He also warned that the United States would not hesitate to
take further action if the interim government's acting president does not
cooperate.
STRONG OPPOSITION IN THE UNITED NATIONS GENERAL ASSEMBLY
At the United Nations General Assembly,
several countries, including Russia and China, strongly condemned the US
actions in Venezuela. Rodríguez stated
that this is not a war because "we are not at war; we have been attacked."
Emphasizing the country's sovereignty, she added that the Venezuelan government
is monitoring the situation in its own country.
The US has faced widespread condemnation for a “crime of aggression” in
Venezuela at an emergency meeting of the United Nations Security Council.
The emergency meeting was called on the request of Colombia in which several countries, including Russia,
China, Iran, Colombia, Cuba,
Eritrea, South Africa, Brazil, Spain and Mexico, participated and condemned the US attack on Venezuela,
calling it a blatant violation of the UN Charter.
OPINION IN THE UNITED STATES IS DEVIDED
According to a Washington Post and SSRS survey, opinion in the United States is divided regarding Maduro's arrest. 40 percent of Americans believe it is justified, while 45 percent consider it wrong. 20 percent remain undecided.
According to a Reuters/Ipsos poll, 33 percent of Americans support the
kidnapping of Maduro, while 34 percent oppose it and 32 percent are undecided.
Some delegations argue the action was exceptional and justified; others
warn it risks normalising unilateral force and eroding state sovereignty.
GLOBAL OIL PRICES
ANI, citing experts, reported that a US attack on Venezuela is unlikely to have a significant impact on global oil prices, as the country's crude oil production is approximately 1 million barrels per day, which is about 1% of the global supply.
The United States has also strengthened its Strategic Petroleum Reserve
and increased domestic oil production, which has helped insulate the global
market from potential disruptions.
Going forward, the impact will depend on political developments in
Venezuela and Washington's next steps. If the U.S. allows American companies to
invest in Venezuela's oil sector, production could increase over time,
potentially impacting global oil markets in the long run.
In recent statements, Trump said that Venezuela had "stolen our oil
rights" years ago during the nationalization of foreign assets, signaling
an intention to re-establish U.S. corporate control over these reserves.
BRIEF HISTORY OF VENEZUELA
Venezuela was once the fourth richest country
in the world. In 1952, while many countries around the world were still
recovering from the devastation of World War II, Caracas, the capital of
Venezuela, boasted VIP roads lined with gleaming luxury cars. Skyscrapers were
being built. In the 1970s, when the oil crisis hit the world and prices
skyrocketed, dollars poured into Venezuelan households. Stories from that era
are still legendary.
People would fly to Miami for weekend shopping
trips. Venezuela was one of the world's biggest buyers of the most expensive
Scotch whisky and champagne. The people had begun to
feel that they no longer needed to work hard. Its per capita income was even
higher than that of developed countries like Spain, Greece, and Israel.
In 1976, the
government nationalized the oil industry and created the state-owned company
PDVSA. It was one of the most profitable oil companies in the world. But this country has lost everything it had gained in 70
years during the last decade.
This also serves as a
lesson on how a country can be completely ruined without a single war. Venezuela focused all its efforts solely on oil
extraction. They neglected agriculture, manufacturing, and other businesses. As
a result, they became dependent on other countries for everything from needles
to food, and began trading oil for goods.
After 1999,
the government squandered money on free schemes instead of investing in the
country's future. Everything was fine as long as oil prices were high, but as
soon as oil prices fell, the government didn't even have enough money to pay
salaries.
The state-owned oil
company (PDVSA) was purged of competent engineers and filled with political
loyalists. This led to a deterioration of oil production technology, and more
than six million educated people (doctors, engineers) left the country.
By 2018,
inflation in the country had reached extreme levels. People were forced to
carry bags full of banknotes just to buy a dozen eggs. The money wasn't
counted; instead, the goods were placed on one side of a scale and bundles of
banknotes on the other.
WHO
SAYS WHAT
Meanwhile, Anuj Gupta,
Director of Ya Wealth, believes that the US attack on Venezuela is expected to
trigger geopolitical tension in the region, which is expected to fuel the
uncertainty.
UN Secretary-General António
Guterres warned that arresting Maduro could increase instability in Venezuela
and the entire region. He also questioned whether the operation complied with
the rules of international law.
Russia's Permanent
Representative to the United Nations, Nebenzya, said: "We cannot allow the
United States to declare itself some kind of supreme judge, with the sole right
to attack any country."
Chinese representative Fu Cong
also supported the accusation, stating that the United States had
"arbitrarily trampled on Venezuela's sovereignty" and violated the
principle of sovereign equality. "No country can act as the world's policeman."
U.S.
Ambassador to the U.N. Mike Waltz cited
Article 51 of the UN charter, which enshrines the right to self-defense, and
said the evidence against Maduro would be presented openly in US court. He
described the Venezuelan leader as “an illegitimate so-called president” and
claimed that millions of Venezuelans, including exiles in Florida, were
celebrating his arrest.
However, it remains unclear
how Trump will impact Venezuela. The U.S. has no direct control on the ground,
and the Maduro government not only remains in power but also shows little
interest in negotiating with Washington.
Nevertheless,
it cannot be denied that Venezuela, despite being an economically weak country,
considers itself on par with a superpower and is inviting trouble by challenging
it in the same language, when it
should have avoided doing so.
Comments
Post a Comment